Why Legalism Is Far More Dangerous Than Licentiousness

The following article was written by Rev. Ken Pierce.

Among religiously conservative people, legalism is the respectable sin. We figure, I fear, that it is far better than license --a necessary corrective to the wanton rebelliousness of our age. Better to be a little scrupulously over-obedient than to dwell in the tents of wickedness with the prostitute and the addict and the tax collector.

Aren't we free to make up rules as we try to work out the thorny issue of obedience?

Admittedly a very difficult issue. Making up rules and expecting others to keep them seem to be evil twins, yet heartfelt obedience is important. How do we keep the Lord's Day without a few rules that govern how we keep it? How do we reign in lust without a few stipulations about what we will allow our daughters to wear, and what entertainment we will watch? No easy answers --it would be legalistic to give them!

Still and all, Jesus has far harsher words for those who are scrupulous about obedience (and, incidentally, often excuse a world of their own disobedience) than he does for the prostitute and the tax collectors, who indeed "go into the kingdom ahead of you." The scrupulous seem inevitably to "treat others with contempt." I know I do.

We make a tragic mistake when we restrict Pharasaism to a strict category, and write ourselves out of it. Our syllogism is simple:

Pharisees believe in justification by works

I believe in justification by faith.

Therefore I am not a Pharisee.

Phew! Glad I got that settled. Not so fast. First, Pharisees weren't (to paraphrase Sinclair Ferguson) Pelagians, they were semi-Pelagians. In plain speech, they didn't believe they were innately free from sin's corrupting influence, who could merit unaided eternal life. Rather, they believed that, with God's help, they could be good people who could lead lives that pleased God --"Lord, I thank thee that I am not as other men are...." They were not sinless, but they were not sinners either. They were good people who sinned. The difference between seeing ones' self as a good person who sins, and a sinner is the difference between winding up in Heaven or in Hell.

Jesus tells his disciples, "Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy." Christians can have Pharisee leaven in their dough. Peter acted the part in Galatia. I am a Pharisee every day, when I comment to a friend on the life choices of a congregant. I am not saying at all that we should never speak to anyone about their sin. I am saying, however, when I think or talk to another in passing judgment on a third party, I am pretty well convicted of being a Pharisee.

Pharisaism is dangerous. It is far more dangerous than lust or greed. It is dangerous precisely because it masquerades as righteousness, as surely as Satan masquerades as an Angel of Light. It is, however, the farthest thing from actual righteousness. Pharisee righteousness is self-derived --the product of God's work in me. True righteousness is derived only from God, by faith. I have no merit and standing with God based upon my obedience, either before my salvation or after. My only hope is God's patience and grace.

We ought to accord various sins the same weight Jesus did. The greatest church in the world would be the one where: a.) sinners were regularly coming to Christ and b.) alongside CEO's and politicians there were strippers and addicts. It would really be awesome to be the pastor of a church like that. I think I'll ask God and see if he'll make it happen.

Ken Pierce is a Teaching Elder in the Presbyterian Church in America, currently serving as Senior Minister at Trinity Presbyterian Church, Jackson, MS. This article first appeared in his blog The Quiet Protest.

Gospel-Driven Sanctification

For the last several weeks I have been preaching through Galatians and of course it is saturated with the nature of the Gospel.  In fact, the word 'Gospel' is used more times in Galatians than any other New Testament book; the exception being Romans where Paul used the word 'Gospel' the same amount of times as he did in Galatians.  All that to say, you cannot study and preach Galatians without being confronted with the nature and power of God's glorious Gospel.  Yet, one of the things that continues to amaze me is how fully orbed Paul was in his teaching on the Gospel; he didn't merely present the Gospel in terms of justification, he also presented it in terms of sanctification.  For example, in Galatians 3:3 he asked, "Are you so foolish?  Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh?"  Paul was saying, "How thick headed can you be?  Why would you ever think that you would be justified by God's free grace and faith alone, yet sanctified through a combination of faith plus works?"  That truth never ceases to stop me in my tracks and smack me across the face.  Our sanctification is just as Gospel-driven as our justification.  

I recently came across an old article written by Jerry Bridges in Modern Reformation magazine.  He begins with these words, "Early in my Christian life I heard someone say, 'The Bible was not given to increase your knowledge but to guide your conduct.'  Later I came to realize that this statement was simplistic at best and erroneous at worst.  The Bible is far more than a rulebook to follow.  It is primarily the message of God's saving grace through Jesus Christ, with everything in Scripture before the cross pointing to God's redemptive work and everything after the cross - including our sanctification - flowing from that work."

Amen, Jerry!  I need those words, those are words of life.

Once Again

So once again I will take on the blogging world.  I think this makes three or four times, but what do they say...fifth times the charm?  It has been proposed by a number of church folks that a blog would be a nice touch, so I will make a noble effort to contribute a few occasional thoughts about one thing or another.  This first entry is simply a way for our webmaster to place some content on our new and improved church website.